نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری، موسسه آموزش عالی لامعی گرگانی، گرگان، ایران
2 دکتری، اداره بینالملل مرکز وکلا، کارشناسان رسمی و مشاوران خانواده قوه قضاییه، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The protection of human rights is often a central component of peace agreements and post‑conflict settlements. Human rights NGOs, which have long worked to secure such protections, are generally expected to play a primary role in ensuring the implementation of human rights obligations. However, the very landscape of political transition that creates opportunities for strengthening human rights enforcement also generates significant difficulties for domestic human rights NGOs. Following a peace agreement, patterns of conflict, existing human rights mechanisms, and the overall configuration of human rights actors undergo substantial transformation. These shifts can create challenges for NGOs in terms of mission definition, prioritization, funding, staffing, and their relationships with other groups. This article describes and analyzes the ways in which transitional contexts influence domestic human rights NGOs, drawing on examples from various countries. One major source of inefficiency within these organizations is the lack of synergy and coordination between domestic and international institutions. Many such NGOs depend heavily on foreign funding and political support; because these resources often come from external states or international bodies, political pressures and conflicting interests can undermine their independence and operational effectiveness. Another challenge stems from divergences between Islamic conceptions of human rights and the international or global interpretations embedded in universal human rights standards. Many Islamic international NGOs, particularly in Eastern and Muslim-majority societies, encounter concepts and norms that may not align with the cultural or legal understandings prevalent in their
own countries. As a result, these organizations may find themselves unable to operate effectively within international frameworks, agreements, and conventions, as differing interpretations of human rights can restrict their capacity to adopt or implement global standards. Furthermore, media‑related and communication challenges significantly impede the effectiveness of these organizations. Many lack the resources required for global media engagement or for producing influential public communications. This shortage limits their ability to disseminate messages effectively at the international level. Overall, despite considerable efforts to promote and safeguard Islamic human rights, these organizations face substantial obstacles—including internal disagreements, tensions with global standards, financial constraints, legal limitations, and communication deficiencies—that hinder their ability to fully achieve their objectives.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)