نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری، گروه حقوق و روابط بینالملل، پردیس بینالمللی کیش (دانشگاه تهران)، کیش، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Using an analytical–comparative method and based on the examination of statutory texts, policy documents, and official reports, this study seeks to set out the theoretical foundations of public law in the field of digital governance, identify deficiencies in Iran’s legal system in comparison with the Canadian legal framework, and propose appropriate solutions. The findings indicate that despite the significant step taken through the 2024 Digital Assets Bylaw, the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran faces serious limitations in achieving effective governance of digital assets. These limitations arise from the lack of explicit upper‑level legislation, the absence of a designated regulatory authority, weak inter‑agency cooperation, and ambiguities within public law related to the creation and circulation of digital currency. In Canada, institutional coherence, clear and anticipatory legislation, accountability mechanisms, and the use of technology for continuous monitoring of digital markets have collectively contributed to establishing effective governance in several areas. Accordingly, reforming Iran’s public‑law framework in dealing with digital assets requires the enactment of comprehensive legislation grounded in public‑law theory, the establishment of a specialized regulatory authority, and enhanced cooperation among governmental, judicial, and security institutions. Moreover, the prudent adoption of comparative experiences from countries such as Canada can assist in designing a localized digital‑governance framework grounded in transparency, legitimacy, and accountability.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)