نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشجو
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Jurisprudence and law is a science that is related to guiding and regulating human behavior. But like any other field of knowledge, it is considered as a subject in philosophical reflections. One of the important axes in the philosophy of jurisprudence and law is philosophical reflections on the language of jurisprudence and law. One of the dimensions of the discussion in the language of jurisprudence and law is the reasonability of jurisprudential&principled linguistic statements. Alameh Tabatabai and Motahari believe that propositions containing credit perceptions-jurisprudence and law are obvious examples – can’t be used in logical reasoning as a prelude to the production and inference of true knowledge. Shahid Motahari states that even between propositions consisting of credit perceptions, there is no productive relationship and the theorems provided by credit themes cannot be argued to arrive at a credit conclusion.The present study is dedicated to this issue and the author tried to defend the possibility of logical reasoning in the field of jurisprudence and law against this challenge and to the question whether in the field of jurisprudence and law, it is possible to make logical reasoning and rational inference or not? Says the answer. According to the research findings, descriptive and predictive propositions in the field of jurisprudence and law are completely semantic and meaningful, and in addition to their truthfulness, their truth and falsity can be recognized and evaluated. Also, jurisprudence and law is a science that relies on all kinds of arguments and arguments and can be argued
کلیدواژهها [English]
)